|
|
Potential and current members of ASDAH, researchers, and media
representatives often ask similar questions about the organization
and/or Health At Every SizeSM. This page provides brief responses and
citations to address these questions. More in-depth documentation is
available on our Resources page. Please also feel free to contact us directly with other questions you may have.
The mission of the Association for Size Diversity and Health (ASDAH) is
to promote education, research, and the provision of services which
enhance health and well-being, and which are free from weight-based
assumptions and weight discrimination.
ASDAH is an international professional organization composed of
individuals who are committed to the principles of Health At Every SizeSM
(HAESSM).
• Accepting and respecting the diversity of body shapes and sizes.
• Recognizing that health and well-being are multi-dimensional and that they include physical,
social, spiritual, occupational, emotional, and intellectual aspects.
• Promoting all aspects of health and well-being for people of all sizes.
• Promoting eating in a manner which balances individual nutritional needs, hunger, satiety,
appetite, and pleasure.
• Promoting individually appropriate, enjoyable, life-enhancing physical activity, rather than exercise
that is focused on a goal of weight loss.
ASDAH is composed of professionals and laypersons from a wide variety
of disciplines: health-related, academic, organizational, and
socio-cultural. Membership is open to any individual whose employment
or volunteer work promotes the Health At Every SizeSM Principles. (see
above)
Yes.
No. ASDAH’s mission is to promote health, well-being and respect for
ALL body shapes and sizes. Because the global culture is focused on
“obesity,” much of our current work has been on that front.
The World Health Organization defines health as "a state of
complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the
absence of disease or infirmity." 1
ASDAH believes that there are many factors to consider when evaluating
the connections between weight and health. Fitness, activity, nutrient
intake, weight cycling or socioeconomic status as well as emotional
support systems and social interactions are all relevant to someone’s
quality of life, health, and wellness status.
You can’t have it both ways. If obesity causes early death, a large
segment of the population won’t live long enough to bankrupt the
medical system, since more people are obese. The reality is, while
weights have increased over the past four decades, mortality rates have
decreased. 2 Except at statistical extremes, the amount of fat on a body is a weak indicator of life expectancy.
Moreover, some studies suggest that people defined as “overweight” live longer than thinner people,3, 4 while
numerous studies have shown that so called ‘weight-related’ health
problems can be treated effectively with lifestyle interventions,
without significant weight loss and in individuals who remain markedly
‘obese’ by traditional medical standards.”5
You know the ratio of your weight to height. And that is all. While it
has become the norm to use BMI as a health measuring tool, it cannot
define or predict one’s health or wellness. The tool is used primarily
because it is easy and inexpensive. In order to speak to many of the
issues that surround health and weight, ASDAH references the BMI index
so our comparisons will be “apples to apples.” However, we believe a
combination of medical and/or psychological tests would better assess
one’s level of health and wellness.
ASDAH believes in promoting all aspects of health and well-being for
people of all sizes. In particular, we advocate eating in a manner that
balances individual nutritional needs with hunger, satiety, appetite,
and pleasure. We also enthusiastically support individually
appropriate, enjoyable, life enhancing physical activity rather than
exercise for the purpose of weight loss.6
A “normal weight” is the weight at which a person’s body settles as
s/he moves towards a more fulfilling, meaningful lifestyle that
includes being physically active and consuming nutritious foods. Not
all people are currently at their most “healthy weight.” Movement
towards a more balanced life will facilitate the achievement of a
“healthy weight.” 3,4
No. ASDAH, as an organizational body, does not endorse or promote the
use of any particular product or program. We do recommend that
individuals work with trusted professionals in a variety of disciplines
to assess their individual needs.
In order to “cure” a condition, the condition must be defined as a
disease. If we say obesity is a disease then we must say on some level
body fat is pathological. But there is no evidence that adipose tissue
is harmful to our health. For most people labeled “obese” their fatness
is not a disorder. 7
All children should be taught the importance of good nutrition and
physical activity. When we focus on only the “overweight” children we
do two things: (1) stigmatize and single out the larger kids as
different/wrong/bad, and (2) leave the smaller children without the
knowledge of how to best take care of themselves.
All children, large and small, should be taught how to best take care
of themselves, that all people come in different shapes and sizes, and
that no one particular shape or size is the best one. If we do that,
then we will help our children to be healthy. Our focus should be on
creating “healthy” kids, not “skinny” kids.
If our scientific/medical community has already decided obesity is a
problem, they will only interpret research to back up that claim. There
are many examples of studies that refute this prevailing point of view,
yet their data are not spread in the mainstream or medical media. For
instance, the risk of death declines with increasing BMI among the
elderly, up to levels considered severely obese. 8-11
It is acceptable--necessary, in fact-- for science to explore the
differences between different body types; i.e., how they function
differently, what their different needs are. But once value is placed
on those differences, it becomes discriminatory, and that is what is
unacceptable.
References
1 Preamble, Constitution of the World Health Organization, 1948
2 National Center For Health Statistics, Social Security Administration, Census Bureau
3 Durazo-Arvizu, R., et al., Mortality and optimal body mass index in a sample of the US population.
American Journal of Epidemiology, 1998. 147: p. 739-749.
4 Flegal, K.M., et al., Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 2005. 293(15): p. 1861-7.
5 charts Adams et al, NEJM 355:763-778, 2006, tables 2 and 3
6 Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Volume 37 Number 4 July • August 2005, "The
National Weight Control Registry: A Critique” JOANNE IKEDA, MA, RD1; NANCY K. AMY,
PHD1; PAUL ERNSBERGER, PHD2 ; GLENN A. GAESSER, PHD3; FRANCIE M. BERG, MS4;
CLAUDIA A. CLARK, PHD5; ELLEN S. PARHAM, PHD, RD, LD, LCPC6; PAULA PETERS, PHD
7 Oliver, JE. (2006). Fat Politics.
8 Breeze E, Clarke R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG & Fletcher AE. Cause-specific mortality in old age in
relation to body mass index in middle age and in old age: follow-up of the Whitehall cohort of male
civil servants. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:169-178.
9 Inoue K, Shono T, Toyokawa S & Kawakami M. Body mass index as a predictor of mortality in
community-dwelling seniors. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006;18:205-210.
10 Alibhai SM, Greenwood C & Payette H. An approach to the management of unintentional weight
loss in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;172:773-780.
11 Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT & Ross R. Body mass index is inversely related to mortality in older
people after adjustment for waist circumference. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:2112-2118.
|
|
|